Which of the following is NOT a consequence of habitat fragmentation?

Habitat fragmentation refers to the process where large, continuous habitats are divided into smaller, isolated patches due to various factors such as human activities, agriculture, or infrastructure development. This division often leads to several ecological consequences.

The correct choice highlights that enhanced habitat connectivity is not a consequence of habitat fragmentation. In fact, habitat fragmentation typically results in reduced connectivity among wildlife populations. When habitats are fragmented, the movement of species between these isolated patches becomes more difficult, compromising genetic exchange and population dynamics.

In contrast, reduced gene flow, increased extinction risks, and population isolation are direct outcomes of habitat fragmentation. Reduced gene flow can lead to inbreeding and lower genetic diversity, thus affecting the resilience of populations. Increased extinction risks arise as smaller populations in fragmented patches can be more vulnerable to stochastic events and environmental changes. Lastly, population isolation reduces interactions between groups, which can lead to divergent evolutionary paths and a higher likelihood of local extinctions due to their inability to recolonize or exchange individuals with neighboring populations.

Therefore, the option highlighting enhanced habitat connectivity accurately reflects that habitat fragmentation has the opposite effect, emphasizing the importance of connectivity for maintaining viable wildlife populations.